Skip to main content

Public standards

How and.guide decides what to publish.

This page explains how topics are selected, which sources are preferred, how examples are labeled, and what happens when a published guide needs correction.

From topic selection to correction

  • Topic selection: a guide begins with a specific DNS, hostname, routing, or certificate decision a reader needs to make.
  • Source review: vendor behavior is checked against primary product documentation; protocol claims use standards or project documentation where possible.
  • Examples: example.com and documentation IP ranges are labeled as illustrative and are never presented as production evidence.
  • Technical review: commands, expected answer shapes, and the boundary of what each check proves are reviewed before publication.
  • Maintenance: material corrections update the page and its visible review or update date.
  • AI assistance: tools may support outlining or editing, but they do not replace source checking; the editorial desk remains responsible for every published claim.
  • Commercial independence: advertising and subdomain-request decisions do not determine guide conclusions or source selection.

Content scope

The publication stays with DNS, subdomains, custom domains, HTTPS, and the infrastructure that connects a public hostname to a working service. A page must answer a concrete reader question within that scope.

Corrections and updates

Corrections are handled by email. Reports should include the affected URL, the disputed claim, and a primary source when available. Material fixes change the visible update or review date.

Source expectations

Product documentation, standards, and original project documentation are preferred. Secondary sources may help discover a question, but they are not treated as authority for vendor-specific behavior.

Editorial ownership

  • Operator: 1990Company
  • Location: South Korea
  • Editorial desk: 1990Company Editorial Desk
  • Contact: admin@and.guide
Open the editorial desk page